How we explain the numbers.

Our policy for formulas, examples, references, attribution, corrections and the boundary between arithmetic and clinical recommendations.

Keep arithmetic separate from recommendations

Examples demonstrate unit conversions. They are not suggested doses, formulations or protocols. Compound pages explain inputs and search questions without claiming that a name alone determines suitable values.

Sources and attribution

We link original sources where a factual discussion needs them, particularly for unit-related errors. A competitor interface can inform an interaction pattern, but its marketing copy is not treated as scientific evidence.

No clinical reviewer, professional credential or external endorsement is claimed unless the person has actually participated and agreed to that attribution.

Corrections and substantive updates

A report should include the page, source inputs, units, displayed result and expected arithmetic. Avoid including personal health details. Formula defects and unit mistakes take priority over cosmetic changes.

Visible update dates reflect substantive content changes. A working calculation does not verify the medical suitability of its inputs.